English 
Description
This post is also available in:
العربية (Arabic)
The Religious Aspect of Philosophy: A Critique of the Bases of Conduct and of Faith
Translated by East National Center for Translation
Also he has of course a decided debt to acknowl edge.
There are in recent philosophical history two promising idealist, with his general and fruitful insistence upon the great fun damental truths of idealism; the other the technical Hegel of the Logik, whose dialectic method seems destined to remain, not a philosophy, but the idea of a philosophy.
With this latter Hegel the author feels a great deal of discontent; to the other Hegel, whose insight, as we know, was by no means inde pendent of that of Fichte and other contemporaries. But who was certainly the most many-sided and crit ical of the leaders of the one great common idealistic movement of the early part of the century, to him we all owe a great debt indeed.
It is, however, a mistake to neglect the other idealists just for the sake of glorifying him. And it is an intolerable blunder to go on repeating what we may have learned from him in the awkward and whimsical speech of the wondrous and crabbed master.
If Hegel taught anything, then what he taught can be conveyed in an utterly non-hegelian vocabulary, or else Hegel is but a king of the rage and tatters of a flimsy terminology, and no king of thought at all. It is therefore absolutely the duty of a man who.
The Religious Aspect of Philosophy: A Critique of the Bases of Conduct and of Faith
For more, click here
This post is also available in:
العربية (Arabic)
